Weer All Waaaaaycist Now!

Peak Guardian?

The reason this programme will prove controversial with large swathes of the white population is because it’s hard for them to accept how deeply racism is embedded in society.

In one of – if not the – least racist societies on the planet.

But the average “Oliver”, let’s say, is going to hate the idea that the reason he doesn’t fancy black girls is because of a messy history which has degraded, masculinised and hypersexualised the black body, even if the show spells out otherwise. Stamping his feet on Twitter he yells into the void: “Is it racist that I prefer McDonald’s over KFC?”

No, it’s because he doesn’t fancy black girls. There’s nothing more to it than that; nothing to do with messy history. It does not make him a racist any more than his preference for blondes over brunettes doesn’t make him brunetist. As Timmy points out, our mating preferences are driven by instinct based upon survival, so we will be drawn towards people who are similar – but not too similar – to ourselves. If we are racist for this, then racism exists at DNA level. But, of course, this is not racist. It is only racist in the minds of the fuckwits in the Guardian.

They will also struggle with the idea that, generally speaking, this problem only goes one way. A black person deciding not to date a white person in the UK is far less common. According to the survey, 35% of white people said they would never date a black person, whereas 10% of black people wouldn’t date a white person. Racism is based on power structures, and this is really looking at white privilege when it comes to dating: there’s not space for a lot else once it’s established how much more desirable white people are viewed in UK society.

This would probably be something to do with Britain being a predominantly white Anglo-Saxon society – we choose people who look a bit like ourselves. So what? Why is this a problem? Oh, that’s right, among those of us out in the real world, it isn’t.

Even so, some key topics are glossed over – such as proximity being a factor in who we date. It seems obvious that with white people being the dominant race in the UK, more people of colour have to be open to dating them. Islamophobia and racism towards Muslims (no one wanted to date a guy called Mohammed, apparently), and the massive degree to which East Asian women are fetishised, aren’t covered in any depth either. “I have a thing for Asian girls,” says one idiot right at the start of the show. “They’re more submissive.”

Well, yeah, I can understand people not wanting to get romantically involved with someone who follows Islam – I wouldn’t want to. However, the only idiot here is not the one being quoted from the show; it is the author of this dire bullshit and makers of this execrable show in their attempts to paint everyone who is white as racist. Whom we choose to mate with is deeply personal and we all have preferences. Are we now to be forcibly matched according to the Guardian’s preferred system? Where will it stop? Are we to be forced to date people of the same sex and opposite colour in order to prove our credentials in this multi-culti wold where diversity means anything but white men?

Let me put it very simply. Our choice of mate is no one else’s business. It does not mean that we are racist if we choose a mate that offends the sensibilities of the cultural Marxists.

It seems that, despite the first gay Muslim marriage and more mixed race people being born than ever before, British people need to start tackling their prejudices when it comes to who they’re willing to open their heart to. Love itself ain’t racist, but trust me, you probably are.

Fuck off!

8 Comments

  1. Aged Mother always said that I was not, on no account, to ‘bring home’ a ‘black, Irish or a Catholic’. So of course I spent my later teenage years looking for a female IRA Soldier of African descent…which, in 80s North Norfolk wasn’t easy…trust me.

    Finally found a black Atheist FRENCH girl which was almost as bad in Aged Mother Dwarf’s eyes. I mention that because she was the only black girl I have ever fancied. Black skin just doesn’t ‘do’ it for me. Neither does Indian skin. Yellow I am quite partial to. Dusky desert tones can be nice too. Is my penis racist? Not so much an erection as a ‘Heil Hitler’? My libido covertly a member of UKIP ?

  2. Well on this question at least I have a completely clear conscience I have fancied and sometimes shagged girls of all colours and religions, except (not deliberately) chinee. I find brown skin as alluring as red or blonde hair. All I really insist on is a cute arse, shapely ankles, decent complexion (including white teeth) and an adventurous personality. And ideally a couple of drinks.

    • Ooooh, no, Pat. Didn’t you know? Only white people can be waycist. It’s ‘cos of their ‘istory, innit? When non-white people express/behave in that same way towards white or non-white-but-not-the-same-non-white-as-them people it’s – errrrr – something else …

  3. I’m attracted to women of all different races. Religion is another matter. Taking religion in any way seriously would be a deal breaker. I also wouldn’t have anything to do with someone from the religion of peace.

    As for being racist, if you extend the meaning of the word until it includes everybody it becomes meaningless.

  4. “idea that the reason he doesn’t fancy black girls”
    Maybe he’d just like to give a miss to social hectoring in his private life. Personal relations can become contentious; adding accusation of inadvertent racism to the mix doesn’t seem like a bright idea.

Comments are closed.