<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Violent Porn Redux</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.longrider.co.uk/blog/2008/04/29/violent-porn-redux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.longrider.co.uk/blog/2008/04/29/violent-porn-redux/</link>
	<description>Sideways comment on the world</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 15:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.longrider.co.uk/blog/2008/04/29/violent-porn-redux/#comment-3285</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 00:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longrider.co.uk/blog/2008/04/29/violent-porn-redux/#comment-3285</guid>
		<description>This law will be unenforcible.  The authorities can expect no cooperation from other police forces as the possession of pornography featuring consenting adults is not illegal in liberal democracies.  Will the British filth be too proud to accept the assistance of Saudi Arabia's religious police, one wonders?  As another poster has said, prosecutions under this law will only occur when police fail examine a suspect's hard drive and find nothing else to prosecute him for.  I doubt that any prosecutions will result from 'Operation Ore' like investigations, as such investigations happen because of international cooperation between law enforcement agencies.  And such cooperation is unlikely to be forthcoming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This law will be unenforcible.  The authorities can expect no cooperation from other police forces as the possession of pornography featuring consenting adults is not illegal in liberal democracies.  Will the British filth be too proud to accept the assistance of Saudi Arabia&#8217;s religious police, one wonders?  As another poster has said, prosecutions under this law will only occur when police fail examine a suspect&#8217;s hard drive and find nothing else to prosecute him for.  I doubt that any prosecutions will result from &#8216;Operation Ore&#8217; like investigations, as such investigations happen because of international cooperation between law enforcement agencies.  And such cooperation is unlikely to be forthcoming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.longrider.co.uk/blog/2008/04/29/violent-porn-redux/#comment-3283</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 09:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longrider.co.uk/blog/2008/04/29/violent-porn-redux/#comment-3283</guid>
		<description>I don't like this law.  I don't like the way it's set out.  Apart from all the libertarian implications: how the hell are you to know if you've broken the law or not?  And the way the legislation is written, even excerpts from BBFC-certified films could land you in jail!  Utterly stupid.  Yes, a woman died at the hands of some sicko but if you were to use that scenario you could pretty much try to justify any encroachment on the liberty of the subject.

I think this kind of law will be used as a 'fishing' exercise - i.e. "we can't get him for something really dodgy, so we'll look through his belongings/computer/videos to see what else we can get him on".  A sad indictment of British society.

Can I move to Denmark now please?  At least the population there isn't entirely made up of morons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t like this law.  I don&#8217;t like the way it&#8217;s set out.  Apart from all the libertarian implications: how the hell are you to know if you&#8217;ve broken the law or not?  And the way the legislation is written, even excerpts from BBFC-certified films could land you in jail!  Utterly stupid.  Yes, a woman died at the hands of some sicko but if you were to use that scenario you could pretty much try to justify any encroachment on the liberty of the subject.</p>
<p>I think this kind of law will be used as a &#8216;fishing&#8217; exercise - i.e. &#8220;we can&#8217;t get him for something really dodgy, so we&#8217;ll look through his belongings/computer/videos to see what else we can get him on&#8221;.  A sad indictment of British society.</p>
<p>Can I move to Denmark now please?  At least the population there isn&#8217;t entirely made up of morons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Longrider</title>
		<link>http://www.longrider.co.uk/blog/2008/04/29/violent-porn-redux/#comment-3282</link>
		<dc:creator>Longrider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 16:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longrider.co.uk/blog/2008/04/29/violent-porn-redux/#comment-3282</guid>
		<description>Common sense doesn't enter the equation. This is, as usual, populism designed to appeal to an infantilised population.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Common sense doesn&#8217;t enter the equation. This is, as usual, populism designed to appeal to an infantilised population.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zorro</title>
		<link>http://www.longrider.co.uk/blog/2008/04/29/violent-porn-redux/#comment-3281</link>
		<dc:creator>Zorro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 12:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longrider.co.uk/blog/2008/04/29/violent-porn-redux/#comment-3281</guid>
		<description>The scariest thing is that this stupid bitch Mrs Longhurst is actually going to end up being directly responsible for more rapes and deaths. (As counter to her insistance, availability of this kind of pornography actually reduces rapes/murder. If the dappy bitch would just bother to look into the figures...) 

I hope someone slaps her in the face with the increasing rape figures in about 5 years time and I hope the bitch will be happy then. So she lost her daughter. Tough shit. Doesn't give her the right to tell everybody else what they can do. Sorry I have /no/ sympathy for her at all now.

Anyone with the slightest bit of common sense should be able to work out that victims of crime should be the last people to make up law.

Look into the rape figures in the US compared to availability of porn if you doubt what I say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The scariest thing is that this stupid bitch Mrs Longhurst is actually going to end up being directly responsible for more rapes and deaths. (As counter to her insistance, availability of this kind of pornography actually reduces rapes/murder. If the dappy bitch would just bother to look into the figures&#8230;) </p>
<p>I hope someone slaps her in the face with the increasing rape figures in about 5 years time and I hope the bitch will be happy then. So she lost her daughter. Tough shit. Doesn&#8217;t give her the right to tell everybody else what they can do. Sorry I have /no/ sympathy for her at all now.</p>
<p>Anyone with the slightest bit of common sense should be able to work out that victims of crime should be the last people to make up law.</p>
<p>Look into the rape figures in the US compared to availability of porn if you doubt what I say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec</title>
		<link>http://www.longrider.co.uk/blog/2008/04/29/violent-porn-redux/#comment-3280</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 11:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longrider.co.uk/blog/2008/04/29/violent-porn-redux/#comment-3280</guid>
		<description>Yes, Blair's Babes have become the Nation's Nannies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Blair&#8217;s Babes have become the Nation&#8217;s Nannies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham Marsden</title>
		<link>http://www.longrider.co.uk/blog/2008/04/29/violent-porn-redux/#comment-3279</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Marsden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 10:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longrider.co.uk/blog/2008/04/29/violent-porn-redux/#comment-3279</guid>
		<description>I am one of those who have been fighting these ridiculous proposals since the start. It is clear that our Government does not trust us to behave like reasonable and sensible adults, they think that if we see this material we're going to do nasty things, so the Nanny State is going to say "we think this is bad for you, so we're not going to let you see it".

Not only that, it will be someone else's *subjective* view on how an image *appears* that will determine whether you are committing an offence, you may not even know if you've broken the law until someone else says "that image is grossly offensive and I think it risks someone's life or might cause them serious injury".

There is still the possibility of getting this ludicrous law thrown out, everyone needs to write to their MPs NOW via http://www.writetothem.com and tell them that they don't was want to see a Thought Crime introduced into British Law.

For more details and counter arguments see the Backlash site at http://www.backlash-uk.org.uk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am one of those who have been fighting these ridiculous proposals since the start. It is clear that our Government does not trust us to behave like reasonable and sensible adults, they think that if we see this material we&#8217;re going to do nasty things, so the Nanny State is going to say &#8220;we think this is bad for you, so we&#8217;re not going to let you see it&#8221;.</p>
<p>Not only that, it will be someone else&#8217;s *subjective* view on how an image *appears* that will determine whether you are committing an offence, you may not even know if you&#8217;ve broken the law until someone else says &#8220;that image is grossly offensive and I think it risks someone&#8217;s life or might cause them serious injury&#8221;.</p>
<p>There is still the possibility of getting this ludicrous law thrown out, everyone needs to write to their MPs NOW via <a href="http://www.writetothem.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.writetothem.com</a> and tell them that they don&#8217;t was want to see a Thought Crime introduced into British Law.</p>
<p>For more details and counter arguments see the Backlash site at <a href="http://www.backlash-uk.org.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.backlash-uk.org.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.longrider.co.uk/blog/2008/04/29/violent-porn-redux/#comment-3278</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longrider.co.uk/blog/2008/04/29/violent-porn-redux/#comment-3278</guid>
		<description>This law makes me sick and after reading that thing about ORE it scares the shit out of me.

How can a bunch of corrupt morally base c**ts preach to us on how we wish to lead our lives.

Robs last blog post..&lt;a href="http://www.thebroadsheetrag.co.uk/?p=293" rel="nofollow"&gt;Spy bots — with us soon…&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This law makes me sick and after reading that thing about ORE it scares the shit out of me.</p>
<p>How can a bunch of corrupt morally base c**ts preach to us on how we wish to lead our lives.</p>
<p>Robs last blog post..<a href="http://www.thebroadsheetrag.co.uk/?p=293" rel="nofollow">Spy bots — with us soon…</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
