Longrider

6
Mar
2008

Still on the Cards

Filed under: Civil Liberties, General News, Political — Longrider @ 19:34 pm

No, it isn’t a rethink, it isn’t a U turn. This is simply another marketing exercise designed to get us all on the national identity register one way or another.

The government has set out changes to its planned identity scheme - including allowing people to use passports or driving licences instead of ID cards.

So much for the idiot Blunkett’s gold standard, then…

Most people will not now have to give their fingerprints when getting a passport until 2011/12 - three years later than had previously been planned.

Hopefully, by then, this iniquitous bunch of fascist bastards will have suffered a humiliating defeat that makes John Major’s fall from number 10 look like a minor slip. One hopes, anyway.

And plans to force passport applicants to get an ID card have been dropped.

It isn’t about the cards, though, is it? Clearly the home secretary thinks we are as stupid as she and her predecessors are. We are not. The database, the tracking of our very lives, is still there, lurking like a monster under a child’s bed, waiting to pounce once the lights are turned off.

The exception will be airport and other workers in security-sensitive jobs who will need an ID card from 2009.

It is reasonable to presume that airport staff already have some sort of identity badge that allows them air-side. If not, why not? And, if so, why do they need another one?

Home Secretary Jacqui Smith said students would also be encouraged to get identity cards from 2010, as part of plans to let “consumer demand” drive take-up.

That is “encouraged” in the same way that New Labour twisted the word “voluntary” to mean something entirely sinister.

God, but I hate these evil bastards with every fibre of my being…

Copyright©2008 Longrider

6
Mar
2008

The War on Terrr

Filed under: Political — Longrider @ 15:32 pm

Via qwghlm, some posters being used by the Metropolitan Police.

2312511339_b19c66ddf6_m 2312511695_aa65267488_m 2313320854_75a0889c93_m

Far be it for me to sound alarmist, but this sort of thing was exactly what the Gestapo did; encourage petty little busy bodies to report their neighbours to the authorities for “suspicious” – i.e. “different” behaviour.

As Chris points out:

The endless calls for heightened vigilance and suspicion of your fellow citizens, in the absence of evidence of a specific threat may be in the name of security, but they lead to a form of mass insecurity.

Indeed. And if I was of a cynical bent, I might just suggest that that is the whole point of the exercise…

Copyright©2008 Longrider

6
Mar
2008

Guardianistas and Reading Plain English

Filed under: General News, Political — Longrider @ 09:56 am

In what is generally a reasonable piece on freedom of speech and the hypocrisy of those who want it for themselves but denied to their opponents, Khalid Diab accuses Boris Johnson of just such offence:

In the UK, Boris Johnson has also suggested that Islam’s holy book needs censorship.

This caused me to stop in my tracks. Nowhere have I ever heard or read of Boris wanting to engage in censorship. So, thinks I, I’d better check this out.

If you read the linked passage it says thus:

They wrote that during the reading of the religious hatred bill, Mr Johnson said: “If this bill makes any sense at all it must mean banning the reading in public or in private of a great many passages of the Qur’an itself.”

So, he wasn’t calling for censorship at all, was he? What he was doing, was using a rhetorical example to highlight the absurdity of the Religious Hatred Bill. It’s a simple enough concept; understandable, surely, even to a half-wit.

So, is Khalid Diab stupid or disingenuous?

Copyright©2008 Longrider

Powered by WordPress